Quantcast
Home / News (page 1170) /

News

98-3400, 98-4218, 99-3797 U.S. v. McGiffen

“United States v. Embry, 128 F.3d 584 (7th Cir. 1997), clarified that a formal evidentiary hearing may not always be necessary, but Embry did not disturb Gurtunca’s requirement that a district court make appropriate findings of availability. To the contrary, ...

Read More »

00-2396-CR, 00-2397-CR State v. Rones

Sherman B. Rones appeals from judgments entered after he pled guilty to three counts of first-degree sexual assault, while using a dangerous weapon, and seven counts of armed robbery, several while concealing identity. Rones also appeals from an order denying ...

Read More »

00-0422-CR State v. Famous

Ronnie Famous has appealed from a judgment convicting him of four counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child, and one count of exposing a child to harmful material. He has also appealed from an order denying a portion of ...

Read More »

01-0684-CR State v. Sekula

Joanne Sekula appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), and from an order denying her motion for an evidentiary hearing on whether her trial counsel was ineffective for ...

Read More »

00-3176 State v. Hughes

This is so because, “the jury’s unanimous findings (confirmed when the trial court polled the jury) that Hughes possessed cocaine with the intent to deliver it, and that he also possessed that cocaine were not inconsistent. Additionally, Hughes does not ...

Read More »

01-0709-CR State v. Smaxwell

Michael A. Smaxwell appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense. Smaxwell argues that there was neither consent nor exigent circumstances to justify the warrantless search of his garage prior to his arrest. ...

Read More »

00-3538 State v. Norton

“It was not known to the trial court at the time of sentencing in this case that Norton’s probation would be revoked; rather, the trial court was advised by Hubbard that probation was not going to be revoked. Thus, the ...

Read More »

00-2237 State ex rel. Eppenger v. Litscher, et al.

Tony Eppenger appeals an order affirming a prison disciplinary decision given him while an inmate at Waupun Correctional Institution. The dispositive issue is whether substantial evidence supports that decision. We conclude that there was insufficient evidence to find Eppenger guilty ...

Read More »

00-3431-CR State v. Scott

William R. Scott appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence after he pled guilty to operating a vehicle without the owner’s consent. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to modify his sentence. Scott claims: (1) ...

Read More »

00-2721 Biesterveld v. Roob

Mark Roob appeals from a default judgment in favor of Scott and Cindy Biesterveld. Roob is a professional photographer and photographed the Biestervelds’ wedding. Their complaint alleged that he breached a contract for the pictures, violated various provisions of Wisconsin’s ...

Read More »

01-0752-CR State v. Chenal

Craig Chenal was involved in a break-in of an abandoned house owned by the estate of Morris White. The State appeals an order that Chenal owed no restitution as a result of his conviction for misdemeanor theft, party to a ...

Read More »

00-3047 Heritage Mutual Insurance Company v. Janda

Richard and Colleen Janda appeal an order granting summary judgment to Heritage Mutual Insurance Company. The order precludes the Jandas from pursuing an uninsured motorist claim under their Heritage policy for personal injuries they sustained while riding their uninsured motorcycle. ...

Read More »

01-0736-CR State v. Malkmus

Gary Malkmus appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence credit. We affirm the orders of the trial court. This opinion will not be published. Dist II, ...

Read More »

00-2719 Hein, et al. v. Frieberg, et al.

Jerome and Judith Hein appeal from a judgment declaring that a homeowners insurance policy issued to Thomas Frieberg did not provide coverage for Jerome’s injuries resulting from an automobile accident allegedly caused by Frieberg’s minor daughter. They contend the trial ...

Read More »

01-0194 Jones v. Secura Insurance

Harold Jones appeals an order declaring that Stacie Jones, his daughter, is not covered by an automobile insurance policy issued to Jones Transportation, his business. The issue is whether the trial court correctly concluded that the policy did not provide ...

Read More »

01-1438-NM, 01-1439-NM In Re the Termination of Parental Rights to Maryah Monika M., Dante Jovan M.: Brown County Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Antonio M., et al.

Tisa C. appeals orders terminating her parental rights to her two children and orders denying her post-termination motions. Tisa challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s finding beyond a reasonable doubt of the likelihood of serious emotional or ...

Read More »

00-1523, 00-2679 U.S. v. Bhutani

“While the plain language of the FDCA clearly prohibited the failure to establish or maintain records, criminal penalties were not clearly imposed. Nevertheless, we agree with the reasoning found in the former set of cases rather than the latter because ...

Read More »

01-1054-CR State v. Arnold

The State appeals an order suppressing incriminating statements that David Arnold made to police. The State argues that (1) Arnold was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2) Arnold’s statements were voluntary because the police used no ...

Read More »