Quantcast
Home / News (page 1142) /

News

99-1155 EEOC v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.

“Ameritech contends that the 30-day, just-cause, and arbitration provisions of the collective bargaining agreement demonstrate that its actions were reasonable, and thus that Amos’s misconduct should not be attributed to the employer. … It did not take Ameritech’s managers long ...

Read More »

00-1678 State v. Gates

Sammy J. Gates appeals pro se from a circuit court order denying his Wis. Stat. sec. 974.06 (1999-2000) postconviction motion. We affirm. This opinion will not be published. Dist II, Winnebago County, Schmidt, J., Per Curiam Attorneys: For Appellant: Sammy ...

Read More »

99-1977 Saucier v. Katz

“[Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) and Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635 (1987)] refute the excessive force/probable cause distinction on which much of respondent’s position seems to depend. The deference owed officers facing suits for alleged excessive force ...

Read More »

00-2568 State v. Entringer

“Forgery cannot be committed by the making of a genuine instrument, although the statements made therein are untrue. The term ‘falsely’ has reference not to the contracts or tenor of the writing, or to the fact stated in the writing, ...

Read More »

00-3448-CR State v. Mumm

Malcolm M. Mumm appeals from the denial of his suppression motions and his conviction of operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited blood alcohol concentration (BAC) second offense. He contends that the illegal seizure of his blood sample and the ...

Read More »

00-189 Idaho v. United States, et al.

“Congress undertook to negotiate with the Coeur d’Alene Tribe for reduction in the territory of an Executive Order reservation that Idaho concedes included the submerged lands at issue here. Congress was aware that the submerged lands were included and clearly ...

Read More »

00-1785-CR State v. Rosenberg

OMVWI; prior convictions; fresh pursuit William C. Rosenberg has appealed from judgments convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), sixth offense and of bail jumping. Rosenberg contends that the trial court erred when it permitted two prior ...

Read More »

00-121 Duncan v. Walker

“Section 2244(d)(2) … employs the word ‘State,’ but not the word ‘Federal,’ as a modifier for ‘review.’ It is well settled that ‘ ‘[w]here Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section ...

Read More »

00-1829-CR State v. David G.K.

David G.K. appeals from a judgment of conviction for sexual assault of a child and incest, and from an order denying postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether the prosecutor breached the plea agreement. We conclude that the prosecutor ...

Read More »

00-2136-CR State v. Ransom

Sebastian C. Ransom appeals from a judgment of conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to deliver and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, Ransom asserts that he should be allowed to withdraw his no ...

Read More »

00-2459-CR State v. Luedke

Daniel Luedke appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of felony impersonating a peace officer and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Luedke argues that his guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. ...

Read More »

00-3101-CR, 00-3102-CR State v. Sackatook

Frank Sackatook, Jr., appeals judgments convicting him of first-degree sexual assault of a child and burglary. He also appeals an order denying his motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. We conclude that the trial court properly denied the motion ...

Read More »

00-1027 In Re the Marriage of: Kuper v. Kuper

Petitioner Leslie L. Kuper appeals from a court order finding her liable to her ex-husband, respondent Craig A. Kuper, for $40,184, representing back taxes, interest, and penalties assessed against Craig by the state and federal governments. Leslie also contends that ...

Read More »

01-0102-CR State v. Vue

Pha Vue appeals his judgment of conviction for two counts of attempted first-degree intentional homicide. Vue argues the trial court erred as a matter of law by: (1) determining that Vue’s statement was admissible even though it was taken after ...

Read More »

00-2669 Friedman, et al. v. Stueber, et al.

David Friedman appeals a summary judgment dismissing his insurer, USAA Casualty Insurance Co. He contends that his USAA uninsured and underinsured motorist policy covers his injuries because they were caused by an accident. Alternatively, Friedman argues that summary judgment should ...

Read More »

00-2304-CR State v. Porter

Crystal Porter appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on her guilty plea to keeping or maintaining a drug house, and from an order denying her request for postconviction relief. Porter claims: (1) she did not voluntarily consent to the ...

Read More »