Quantcast
Home / News (page 1102) /

News

00-1992 Herlache v. Zahran, et al.

Robin and Karen Zahran have appealed pro se from an order entered in the trial court on June 20, 2000, establishing the amount to be paid by them for the redemption of property which was the subject of a sheriff’s ...

Read More »

00-3174 U.S. v. Mitchell

“The officers, upon their arrival at the scene, clearly did not have sufficient information to immediately arrest Mitchell for being a felon in possession. However, we are of the opinion that the combination of a report of shots being fired, ...

Read More »

00-1967 U.S. v. Martinez

“The testimony of Gladney, Martinez’s main supplier of crack (but not his only source as testimony indicated at trial), places Martinez in possession of a minimum of 30 ounces (850.5 grams) of crack. In addition, there were numerous witnesses who ...

Read More »

00-2625-CR State v. Lee

Eugene Lee appeals a judgment convicting him as a felon in possession of a firearm, as a repeat offender. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly ...

Read More »

00-3227 U.S. v. Bautista

“[W]e see nothing in the Guidelines that forbids consideration of extralegal consequences that follow a sentence as grounds for a departure. In Koon, for example, the Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit’s holding that career loss following imprisonment could never ...

Read More »

00-0076 State ex rel. Spriggie Hensley v. Endicott

Although plaintiff argued that there was a “futility” exception to the PLRA, that it would essentially be futile to require plaintiff to bring his constitutional challenges to the rules in question before the institution’s complaint review committees and appeal personnel ...

Read More »

01-2460 Graham v. Lappin

“Plaintiffs have standing, for they allege both a concrete injury to themselves and the possibility that the relief they seek will redress that injury. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992). Moreover, a district court is ...

Read More »

99-0946 Salveson v. Douglas County

“In deciding to award back pay, the circuit court found that Salveson was physically unable to work as a full-time street paramedic, but that she was able to perform other, less rigorous paramedic work. The court noted that after she ...

Read More »

01-0203 Town of Madison v. Gartland

Randall E. Gartland appeals a circuit court judgment convicting him of speeding. He argues that the circuit court erred in failing to dismiss the charge against him because the prosecutor failed to comply with a court order requiring him to ...

Read More »

00-2326 Newsome v. McCabe

“Putting Buckley and all problems of establishing causation to one side, we make the normal immunity inquiry: was it clearly established in 1979 and 1980 that police could not withhold from prosecutors exculpatory information about fingerprints and the conduct of ...

Read More »

99-0649 Martindale v. Ripp

And, because we conclude that this erroneous exercise of discretion affected plaintiff’s substantial rights, we reverse and remand the case to the circuit court for a new trial. “Here the circuit court erred for several reasons. First, the circuit court ...

Read More »

98-3329 Baierl v. McTaggart

Accordingly, summary judgment was properly entered in favor of the tenants and the decision of the court of appeals must be reversed. Although the landlord argues that the illegal provision is severable from the remainder of the lease, we disagree. ...

Read More »

00-2522 Townsend v. Vallas

“In Mr. Townsend’s case, however, the Board only temporarily transferred him from his teaching position, pending an investigation regarding the death of a child, and it provided Mr. Townsend with his full teacher’s salary while it did so. Within two ...

Read More »

00-2827 Equity Enterprises, Inc. v. Milosch

“Therefore, because section 5.1 does not contain any geographical restrictions, section 5.1 fails and the jury finding that it was reasonable is an error of law.” In addition, we conclude that the stipulated damages clause of the contract, sec. 4.2, ...

Read More »

00-4145 Delany v. DeTella, et al.

“Here, both in duration and severity, the nature of Delaney’s alleged deprivation was significant and serious, and apparently no alternatives were made available to mitigate the effects of the deprivation. We recently noted that segregation is akin to solitary confinement ...

Read More »

00-0003 Reid v. Benz

“In Elliott [v. Donahue, 169 Wis.2d 310 (1992)] we clearly stated that the proper procedure for an insurance company to follow when coverage is disputed is to request a bifurcated trial on the issues of coverage and liability and move ...

Read More »

98-2162 Green v. Smith & Nephew, AHP

“In Vincer v. Esther Williams All-Aluminum Swimming Pool Co., 69 Wis.2d 326(1975), this court adopted Comment g to sec. 402A, which provides that a product is defective ‘where the product is, at the time it leaves the seller’s hands, in ...

Read More »

99-0380 Koffman v. Leichtfuss

“The plaintiff contends that he is nonetheless entitled to seek the reasonable value of medical services rendered. He maintains that the collateral source rule renders irrelevant any payments made by his insurers. The defendants seek to limit the medical expenses ...

Read More »

99-0743 State v. Franklin

“We find nothing in Hansford to support the conclusion that the difference between a six-person jury trial and a twelve-person jury trial is so fundamental that a six-person jury trial, which was conducted without objection under the express authority of ...

Read More »

00-4064 U.S. v. Gochis

“In this case, there is no indication that Gochis has suffered any prejudice as a result of the magistrate judge’s failure to admonish him about his right to a trial before a district judge. His primary concern was to have ...

Read More »

00-1718 State v. Leitner

“The trial court properly denied the motion because it was not supported by a preponderance of evidence showing that Leitner actually had an alibi witness which he had previously chosen to conceal. At the hearing on his motion to withdraw ...

Read More »