Quantcast
Home / Legal News (page 468) /

Legal News

Court reviews claims for plea withdrawal

What the court held Case: State v. Goynette, No. 2004AP2211-CR & State v. Howell, No. 2005AP731-CR. Issue: Is a "package plea agreement" inherently coercive? Is a defendant who claims he did not understand party-to-a-crime liability entitled to an evidentiary hearing ...

Read More »

Intervention Case Analysis

Although the decision in this case bars the firm from intervening in its former associate’s action to recover what it claims are fees due it, the decision does not bar other firms from intervening in future similar cases. Most important ...

Read More »

Former law firm denied intervention

What the court held Case: Lonergan v. Employers Mut. Cas. Co., No. 2005AP1959 Issue: Did the trial court properly exercise its discretion in not allowing the former law firm of the plaintiff’s attorney to intervene to collect what it claims ...

Read More »

Misrepresentation Case Analysis

The effect of the decision is to render wholly ineffective the standard CGL exclusions of coverage for misrepresentations. Claims under sec. 100.20 are now ubiquitous, whenever the facts give rise to an action for common-law misrepresentation, and with good reason ...

Read More »

Insurer liable for unfair trade practices

What the court held Case: Stuart v. Weisflog’s Showroom Gallery, Inc., No. 2005AP1287 Issue: Does a standard CGL policy exclude coverage for claims of statutory misrepresentation under Wis. Admin. Code ATCP ch. 110? Holding: No. Only common law misrepresentation claims ...

Read More »

Presumption Case Analysis

The decision creates an intracircuit split of authority that, presumably, will have to be resolved by en banc review. Just one week to the day before this decision was issued, a different panel of the court held that there is ...

Read More »

Seventh Circuit sentencing split

What the court held Case: U.S. v. Hankton, Nos. 03-2345 & 03-2915. Issue: Does the presumption that a guideline sentence is reasonable apply at the district court level? Holding: Yes. The presumption is not limited to appellate review of guideline ...

Read More »

Real estate attorneys remaining busy

A casual summer walk through many Wisconsin neighborhoods in 2005 would have revealed “For Sale” signs rotating like seasonal lawn ornaments, a tribute to a booming real estate market. Take that same stroll this year and those signs may remain ...

Read More »

Reasonableness Case Analysis

The decision is significant for a number of reasons. First, a below-guideline sentence may never be based solely on the fact that intended loss far exceeded actual loss. Just as the disparity between crack and powder cocaine is not a ...

Read More »

Court vacates non-guideline sentence

What the court held Case: U.S. v. Wallace, No. 05-3675. Issue: Can a court impose a below-guideline sentence, if the intended loss is substantially greater than the actual loss? Holding: No. The guidelines expressly require that the sentence be imposed ...

Read More »

Ex Post Facto Case Analysis

The opinion in this case is probably the most remarkable post-Booker decision yet, in this circuit or any other. The first and foremost question people are asking is, “What is the Department of Justice going to do?” And that would ...

Read More »

Court issues landmark ex post facto decision

What the court held Case: U.S. v. Demaree, No. 05-4213. Issue: Does it violate the ex post facto clause to use the current longer sentence guideline than the one in effect when the crimes were committed? Holding: No. Because the ...

Read More »

No Merit Case Analysis

In a footnote, the court suggested that Wisconsin’s rules governing no-merit cases be reconsidered. The court wrote, “The SPD asserts in its reply brief that ‘the Robbins majority adopts the position advocated by the [SPD] in McCoy: that the Wisconsin ...

Read More »

Claim Preclusion Case Analysis

The plaintiffs cannot be faulted for thinking they could file a second lawsuit, despite the dismissal of the first. The Seventh Circuit’s opinion in the first case states, “Citizens’ focus in this case is … the Ackerville Bridge Project. … ...

Read More »

Prior suit bars subsequent action

The doctrine of claim preclusion bars subsequent litigation, even though the plaintiffs’ legal theories in the second action differ from those in the first, the Seventh Circuit held on Aug. 2. The County J/Highway 164 Project involves the expansion of ...

Read More »

Skwierawski takes helm of MBA

Hon. Michael Skwierawski Retirement has been kind to Michael Skwierawski, but he has not been kind to retirement. The former Milwaukee County judge hung up his judicial robes in August 2003 after presiding over 513 jury trials during his 25 ...

Read More »

Brunner receives national recognition

Hon. Edward R. Brunner Barron County Circuit Court When Judge Edward R. Brunner, who recently received a national award for judicial excellence, decided to go into law, he never imagined he’d be a judge. But when the state Legislature expanded ...

Read More »

Emotional Distress Case Analysis

For purposes of the analysis, we can assume that the child did suffer emotional distress, and that it was severe. However, the most likely cause of that distress was the killing of his dog, rather than being chased with dog ...

Read More »

Emotional distress claim viable

What the court held Case: Camp v. Anderson, No. 2005AP2407. Issue: Is a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress limited to cases where a bystander witnesses injury to a family member? Holding: No. Regardless of the fact situation in ...

Read More »

Levine questions bar exam equity

I believe the current situation with two standards — diploma privilege, or passing the bar exam — is unfair, so a task force is being formed to study the rules and regulations of both standards. Steven A. Levine, President, State ...

Read More »

Fee Splitting Case Analysis

Although the court is correct that no Wisconsin cases interpret secs. 757.295 or 757.45, there is one Wisconsin case that interprets an earlier barratry statute — Chicago, M., St. P. & P. Ry. Co. v. Wolf, 199 Wis. 278, 226 ...

Read More »

Fee-splitting agreement unenforceable

What the court held Case: Abbott v. Marker, No. 2005AP2853 Issue: Is a contract, providing that an attorney shall pay kickbacks to a non-lawyer who refers clients, enforceable? Holding: The contract is contrary to both statute and public policy, therefore, ...

Read More »