Quantcast
Home / Case Digests (page 881) /

Case Digests

00-3129-CR State v. Behnken

The trial court, consistent with a joint sentencing recommendation under a plea agreement, imposed and stayed a six-year prison term and placed Michael Behnken on probation. He appeals the judgment convicting him of disorderly conduct and resisting an officer, claiming ...

Read More »

00-3363-FT Fahser, et al. v. Hilgart

Robert Fahser appeals an order, which denied his motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the judgment in favor of Wesley and Donna Hilgart on Fahser’s and Duane Klawitter’s claims for adverse possession and prescriptive easement. ...

Read More »

00-6374 Becker v. Mongtomery, et al.

“As plainly as Civil Rule 11(a) requires a signature on filed papers, however, so the rule goes on to provide in its final sentence that ‘omission of the signature may be corrected promptly after being called to the attention of ...

Read More »

98-3139 State v. Bond

Where the court is evenly divided on whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals, the decision of the court of appeals must be affirmed. Court of Appeals, Per Curiam Attorneys: For Appellant: Ellen Henak, Madison ...

Read More »

00-3363-FT Fahser, et al. v. Hilgart (55157)

Robert Fahser appeals an order, which denied his motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the judgment in favor of Wesley and Donna Hilgart on Fahser’s and Duane Klawitter’s claims for adverse possession and prescriptive easement. ...

Read More »

No. 130, Orig., New Hampshire v. Maine

“New Hampshire’s claim that the Piscataqua River boundary runs along the Maine shore is clearly inconsistent with its interpretation of the words ‘Middle of the River’ during the 1970’s litigation… [I]nterpretation of those words was ‘necessary’ to fixing the northern ...

Read More »

99-2968 State v. Johnson

We further hold that the statute, Wis. Stat. sec. 948.025, is constitutional, and defendant, who was convicted of the repeated sexual assault of a child, is not entitled to a new trial. In sum, even though the State introduced evidence ...

Read More »

00-24 PGA Tour Inc. v. Martin Stevens, J.

“Under the ADA’s basic requirement that the need of a disabled person be evaluated on an individual basis, we have no doubt that allowing Martin to use a golf cart would not fundamentally alter the nature of petitioner’s tournaments. As ...

Read More »

99-1128 State v. Hansen

The circuit court erred in holding that sec. 961.45 required application of the “elements only” test of Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932) to determine whether the prior conviction was for the same act. Accordingly, we reverse the ...

Read More »

00-3054-CR State v. Hill

Adam Hill appeals a judgment convicting him of making a bomb threat. He also appeals an order denying postconviction relief. Hill contends that he is entitled to a new trial because he was convicted on the basis of an in-court ...

Read More »

99-1964 Booth v. Churner

“When Congress replaced the text of the statute as construed in [McCarthy v. Madigan] with the exhaustion requirement at issue today, it presumably understood that under McCarthy the term ‘effective’ in the former sec. 1997e(a) eliminated the possibility of requiring ...

Read More »