Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

By: Derek Hawkins//March 22, 2022

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

By: Derek Hawkins//March 22, 2022

WI Court of Appeals – District I

Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Jared J. Lanier-Cotton

Case No.: 2020AP1119-CR

Officials: Donald, P.J., Dugan and White, JJ.

Focus: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Jared J. Lanier-Cotton appeals his judgment of conviction for substantial battery intending bodily harm, intimidating a witness by use of force, battery to a witness, all as party to a crime, and felony bail jumping. Further, he appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief. Lanier-Cotton argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel failed to object to the State’s use of other-acts evidence for an impermissible purpose. Additionally, he contends the trial court erroneously admitted testimony that impermissibly vouched for another witness and admitted impermissible hearsay in violation of his constitutional Confrontation Clause rights. Finally, he argues that the trial court erred when it failed to strike a juror for cause. We reject all of his arguments and, accordingly, we affirm.

Full Text

[box type=”shadow” ]
Derek A Hawkins is Corporate Counsel, at Salesforce.[/box]


Should Justice Protasiewicz recuse herself on gerrymandering cases that go before the Wisconsin Supreme Court?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests