Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Unlawful Seizure – Suppression of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//March 10, 2022//

Unlawful Seizure – Suppression of Evidence

By: Derek Hawkins//March 10, 2022//

Listen to this article

WI Court of Appeals – District II

Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Robby R. Walentowski

Case No.: 2020AP865-CR

Officials: Gundrum, P.J., Neubauer and Reilly, JJ.

Focus: Unlawful Seizure – Suppression of Evidence

Robby R. Walentowski appeals a judgment of conviction, entered upon his guilty pleas, for five counts of possession of child pornography. He argues the circuit court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of his cellular telephone, under circumstances where the phone was confiscated during an unlawful seizure of his person under Bailey v. United States, 568 U.S. 186 (2013). Like the circuit court, we conclude the inevitable discovery doctrine applies because police had already obtained a search warrant that authorized police to confiscate any “cellular/digital telephones” and the State established by a preponderance of the evidence that, but for the illegal seizure a short distance from the home, Walentowski’s iPhone would have been discovered and seized when he arrived at the residence. Accordingly, we affirm.

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is Corporate Counsel, at Salesforce.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests