Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings

By: Derek Hawkins//October 21, 2021//

Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings

By: Derek Hawkins//October 21, 2021//

Listen to this article

WI Supreme Court

Case Name: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel Parks

Case No.: 2021 WI 74

Focus: Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings

Pending before the court is Attorney Daniel Parks’ second petition for reinstatement of his license to practice law in Wisconsin. Upon consideration of the reinstatement petition; Attorney Parks’ affidavit in support of his reinstatement petition; the Office of Lawyer Regulation’s (OLR) response pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.30(4); the parties’ SCR 22.30(5)(a) stipulation; the OLR’s memorandum in support of the stipulation (attaching Attorney Anthony O’Malley’s comment in support of reinstatement); and Attorney Parks’ response to the OLR’s memorandum, we conclude that reinstatement, upon conditions, is appropriate.

Reinstatement granted upon conditions



Full Text

Derek A Hawkins is Corporate Counsel, at Salesforce.


What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests