Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Involuntary Commitment

By: Derek Hawkins//September 30, 2021//

Involuntary Commitment

By: Derek Hawkins//September 30, 2021//

Listen to this article

WI Court of Appeals – District II

Case Name: Waukesha County v. M.J.S.,

Case No.: 2021AP105-FT

Officials: REILLY, P.J.

Focus: Involuntary Commitment

M.J.S. appeals from an order of the circuit court extending his involuntary commitment and from an order denying his post-disposition motion. M.J.S. sought a jury trial on the extension of his commitment, but the circuit court found that M.J.S.’s jury demand was untimely pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 51.20(11)(a). M.J.S. argues that as his final hearing was adjourned by the court, his jury demand was not untimely, and, further, our supreme court’s COVID-19 pandemic orders altered the deadlines in his case. We agree with the circuit court’s conclusion that M.J.S.’s jury demand was untimely and that the supreme court orders are inapplicable. Accordingly, we affirm.

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is Corporate Counsel, at Salesforce.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests