Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Claim Preclusion

By: Derek Hawkins//September 13, 2021//

Claim Preclusion

By: Derek Hawkins//September 13, 2021//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: Peter Daza v. State of Indiana, et al.,

Case No.: 20-1209

Officials: KANNE, WOOD, and SCUDDER, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Claim Preclusion

Peter Daza once worked for the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), but he was fired in 2015. Believing that the agency took that step for discriminatory and retaliatory reasons, he sued it in 2017. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants, however, and we affirmed its decision. See Daza v. Indiana, 941 F.3d 303 (7th Cir. 2019) (Daza I). That should have been the end of things, but it was not. Days after the district court dismissed his first action, he filed the present case, which is identical except for the addition of a failure-to-rehire allegation. The district court dismissed the new action on claim-preclusion grounds, and we affirm.

Affirmed

 

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is Corporate Counsel, at Salesforce.

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests