Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

De Novo Review – Malpractice Claim

By: Derek Hawkins//September 7, 2021//

De Novo Review – Malpractice Claim

By: Derek Hawkins//September 7, 2021//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: Linda S. Bergal v. Ben M. Roth, et al.,

Case No.: 20-2887

Officials: KANNE, ROVNER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Focus: De Novo Review – Malpractice Claim

Plaintiff Linda Bergal brought this malpractice case against her attorney Ben Roth, his law firm, and accountant Joseph Sanders. She alleges the defendants duped her into disclaiming a $1.5 million mutual fund account owned by her late husband, Dr. Milton Bergal. The district court dismissed Linda’s claims as barred under the doctrine of issue preclusion (collateral estoppel) based on a state-court judgment that she obtained her claim on the account through undue influence. We affirm.

Affirmed

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is Corporate Counsel, at Salesforce.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests