Monetary Judgment – Contract Modification

By: Derek Hawkins//June 29, 2021//

Listen to this article

WI Court of Appeals – District III

Case Name: Daniel S. Krueger v. Paul C. Hsu, et al.,

Case No.: 2019AP2030

Officials: Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ.

Focus: Monetary Judgment – Contract Modification

Paul Hsu and Hsu’s Ginseng Enterprises, Inc., (collectively Hsu) appeal from a money judgment entered against both Paul and the corporation, stemming from a futures contract for the sale of ginseng grown by Daniel Krueger. Hsu argues that Paul was not a party to the contract with Krueger; the parties had modified the contract by their conduct; and even if the parties did not modify the contract, Krueger failed to mitigate his damages. We reject Hsu’s arguments and affirm.

Full Text

Derek A Hawkins is Associate Corporate Counsel, IP at Amazon.

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event