By: Derek Hawkins//October 6, 2020//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. Sevon E. Thomas
Case No.: 19-2129
Officials: RIPPLE, WOOD, and SCUDDER, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Jury Instructions
Sevon Thomas found himself charged with possessing a firearm in connection with a drug trafficking crime after he agreed to sell methamphetamine to a government cooperator. Once Thomas drove to the prearranged delivery time and place, the police arrested him and searched his car. When police opened the glove compartment, out fell two firearms and a bag of methamphetamine. At trial Thomas claimed that he used the guns for lawful purposes unrelated to drug dealing and therefore did not possess them “in furtherance of” a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i). A jury disagreed and found Thomas guilty. On appeal Thomas argues that the district court made two errors at trial: improperly admitting so-called “dual-role” (both expert and lay) testimony from a federal agent and bungling the jury instructions. But Thomas raised neither challenge below, so he had to show a plain error necessitating reversal of his conviction. He falls short, so we affirm.
Affirmed