Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing Guidelines – First Step Act

By: Derek Hawkins//September 15, 2020//

Sentencing Guidelines – First Step Act

By: Derek Hawkins//September 15, 2020//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: United States of America v. Vincent Corner

Case No.: 19-3517

Officials: WOOD, BARRETT, and ST. EVE, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Sentencing Guidelines – First Step Act

Vincent Corner violated the conditions of his supervised release, and he was sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment followed by 42 months’ supervised release. Corner later moved for a reduced sentence under section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018. The district court did not assess Corner’s eligibility for relief under the Act, explaining that it would not lower his sentence regardless of his eligibility because he had violated the terms of his release. Corner appeals, arguing that it was procedural error for the district court to deny relief without first determining whether the Act applied to his sentence and what the new statutory penalties would be. We agree, so we vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

While serving a term of supervised release for possessing with intent to distribute 11 grams of cocaine base (i.e., crack), 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), Corner violated the conditions by using and possessing illegal drugs, failing to comply with drug testing, and lying to his probation officer about his inability to maintain employment. Because Corner had tested positive for controlled substances more than three times in one year, the district court determined that revocation of his supervised release was mandatory. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g)(4). The court noted that the statutory maximum for Corner’s reimprisonment was three years, id. § 3583(e)(3), and that another term of supervised release of 60 months, minus the revocation sentence, could be imposed, id. § 3583(h). It sentenced Corner to 18 months’ imprisonment (half of the statutory maximum) and 42 months of supervised release.

Shortly after Corner was sentenced, Congress passed the First Step Act of 2018, which empowers district courts to re‐ duce a defendant’s sentence by applying the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 retroactively. First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115–391, § 404(b), 132 Stat. 5194. The Fair Sentencing Act, in relevant part, modified 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(iii)—under which Corner was convicted—by reducing the statutory minimum penalties and increasing the amount of crack necessary to trigger those penalties from 5 grams to 28 grams. Fair Sentencing Act, Pub. L. 111‐220, § 801, 124 Stat. 2372.

Congress afforded district courts wide discretion in the First Step Act context. But by not considering what reduced penalties would now apply to Corner’s offense, the district court fell short of the review envisioned by the Act. Corner has finished serving his revocation sentence, but his appeal is not moot because the court could still reduce his term of supervised release. See Mont v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 1826, 1834 (2019); United States v. Sutton, 962 F.3d 979, 982 (7th Cir. June 23, 2020). We therefore VACATE the district court’s judgment and REMAND for further proceedings.

Vacated and remanded

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is trademark corporate counsel for Harley-Davidson. Hawkins oversees the prosecution and maintenance of the Harley-Davidson’s international trademark portfolio in emerging markets.

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests