Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Habeas Corpus – Successive Petition

By: Derek Hawkins//July 29, 2020//

Habeas Corpus – Successive Petition

By: Derek Hawkins//July 29, 2020//

Listen to this article

United States Supreme Court

Case Name: Gregory Dean Banister v. Lorie Davis

Case No.: 18-6943

Focus: Habeas Corpus – Successive Petition

A state prisoner is entitled to one fair opportunity to seek federal habeas relief from his conviction. But he may not usually make a “second or successive habeas corpus application.” 28 U. S. C. §2244(b). The question here is whether a motion brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter or amend a habeas court’s judgment qualifies as such a successive petition. We hold it does not. A Rule 59(e) motion is instead part and parcel of the first habeas proceeding.

Reversed and remanded

Dissenting: ALITO, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which THOMAS, J., joined.

Concurring:

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is trademark corporate counsel for Harley-Davidson. Hawkins oversees the prosecution and maintenance of the Harley-Davidson’s international trademark portfolio in emerging markets.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests