By: Derek Hawkins//July 29, 2020//
United States Supreme Court
Case Name: Gregory Dean Banister v. Lorie Davis
Case No.: 18-6943
Focus: Habeas Corpus – Successive Petition
A state prisoner is entitled to one fair opportunity to seek federal habeas relief from his conviction. But he may not usually make a “second or successive habeas corpus application.” 28 U. S. C. §2244(b). The question here is whether a motion brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter or amend a habeas court’s judgment qualifies as such a successive petition. We hold it does not. A Rule 59(e) motion is instead part and parcel of the first habeas proceeding.
Reversed and remanded
Dissenting: ALITO, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which THOMAS, J., joined.
Concurring: