By: Derek Hawkins//June 2, 2020//
WI Court of Appeals – District IV
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Peter J. Weyker
Case No.: 2019AP1140
Officials: Fitzpatrick, P.J., Kloppenburg and Nashold, JJ.
Focus: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
In 2009, a jury convicted Peter J. Weyker of eight counts involving the sexual assault of his then fifteen-year-old daughter in July 2008 and the taking or attempted taking of videos showing nudity of four teenagers in June and July 2008. Weyker makes six arguments in this appeal: (1) Weyker’s trial counsel provided ineffective assistance when he failed to appear on the morning of the first scheduled trial date; (2) a 2013 change in the Wisconsin State Crime Laboratory DNA Manual regarding the reporting of DNA quantities below a certain threshold is newly discovered evidence requiring a new trial on the sexual assault charges; (3) a 2013 article reporting on the possibility of speculum contamination of DNA samples is newly discovered evidence requiring a new trial on the sexual assault charges; (4) alternatively, if the speculum contamination article is not newly discovered evidence, then trial counsel provided ineffective assistance for failing to argue possible speculum contamination at trial and the prosecutor violated Weyker’s due process rights by making a false closing argument that did not acknowledge possible speculum contamination; (5) Weyker’s prior appellate counsel provided ineffective assistance for failing to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on trial counsel’s failure to appear on the first scheduled trial date and to argue possible speculum contamination; and (6) Weyker is entitled to a new trial on the sexual assault charges in the interest of justice. For the reasons stated below, we reject Weyker’s arguments and affirm.