Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Prisoner – Involuntary Commitment and Medication

By: Derek Hawkins//May 27, 2020//

Prisoner – Involuntary Commitment and Medication

By: Derek Hawkins//May 27, 2020//

Listen to this article

WI Supreme Court

Case Name: Langlade County v. D.J.W.

Case No.: 2020 WI 41

Focus: Prisoner – Involuntary Commitment and Medication 

The petitioner, D.J.W., seeks review of an unpublished, authored decision of the court of appeals affirming the circuit court’s order extending his involuntary commitment. The court also continued his involuntary medication and treatment on an inpatient basis. D.J.W. contends that Langlade County (the County) did not present sufficient evidence of his dangerousness to sustain an extension of his involuntary commitment.

At the recommitment hearing, the County’s expert witness testified that D.J.W. had lost a job, relied on his parents for housing, and received disability benefits due to schizophrenia and delusions. D.J.W. takes issue with the County’s reliance on this information in demonstrating that he is “dangerous” to himself pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 51.20(1)(a)2. In response, the County asserts that taken as a whole the testimony is sufficient to determine that D.J.W. would be a proper subject for commitment if treatment were withdrawn under § 51.20(1)(am).

We determine that going forward circuit courts in recommitment proceedings are to make specific factual findings with reference to the subdivision paragraph of Wis. Stat. § 51.20(1)(a)2. on which the recommitment is based. Further, we conclude that the evidence introduced at the recommitment hearing was insufficient to support a conclusion that D.J.W. is “dangerous” pursuant to either §§ 51.20(1)(a)2.c. or 2.d. and 51.20(1)(am).

Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals.

Reversed

Concur:

Dissent: ROGGENSACK, C.J., filed a dissenting opinion. REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J., filed a dissenting. opinion.

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is trademark corporate counsel for Harley-Davidson. Hawkins oversees the prosecution and maintenance of the Harley-Davidson’s international trademark portfolio in emerging markets.

Polls

Should Wisconsin Supreme Court rules be amended so attorneys can't appeal license revocation after 5 years?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests