By: Derek Hawkins//April 20, 2020//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Brickstructures, Inc., v. Coaster Dynamix, Inc.,
Case No.: 19-2187
Officials: EASTERBROOK, ROVNER, and SCUDDER, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Arbitration
Brickstructures, Inc. and Coaster Dynamix, Inc. joined forces to create a LEGO‐compatible roller coaster set. The venture later soured, and Brickstructures filed a lawsuit in federal court against its former partner. The two companies had signed an agreement that contained an arbitration provision. Coaster Dynamix invoked that provision in a second motion to dismiss. Brickstructures viewed the motion as untimely (indeed frivolous) and stated so in a letter that threatened sanctions if Coaster Dynamix did not withdraw its motion. The tactic worked, and Coaster Dynamix withdrew its arbitration demand. When Coaster Dynamix renewed the argument in a motion to compel arbitration, the district court denied the resurrected request on the ground that the earlier withdrawal amounted to a waiver of the right to arbitrate. We agree.
Affirmed