Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Abuse of Discretion – Eviction

By: Derek Hawkins//April 7, 2020//

Abuse of Discretion – Eviction

By: Derek Hawkins//April 7, 2020//

Listen to this article

WI Court of Appeals – District IV

Case Name: Tree Lane Apartments, LLC, v. Kimberly Gaddis, et al.,

Case No.: 2019AP803; 2019AP810

Officials: Blanchard, Kloppenburg, and Graham, JJ.

Focus: Abuse of Discretion – Eviction

Tree Lane Apartments, LLC (“the landlord”) issued 5-day notices to terminate the tenancies of Kimberly Gaddis and Pamela Windom, both based on alleged nonpayment of rent. The landlord followed the notices with eviction actions. Gaddis contested her eviction in the circuit court, but the landlord prevailed. Windom stipulated with the landlord that she would move out and thereby avoided entry of a judgment of eviction. About 60 days later, after both former tenants had vacated their units, each moved for relief from judgment under WIS. STAT. § 806.07(1). Each former tenant argued, for the first time, that she was entitled to relief because the landlord did not have a right to evict her using a 5-day notice, in light of the fact that the lease was “void and unenforceable” under WIS. STAT. § 704.44(10). The circuit court judge in each case denied the motion for relief and both former tenants appeal. We reject one set of arguments advanced by the former tenants based on forfeiture and reject the remaining arguments because the circuit court judges did not erroneously exercise their broad discretionary authority in denying the respective motions under § 806.07(1)(h).

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is trademark corporate counsel for Harley-Davidson. Hawkins oversees the prosecution and maintenance of the Harley-Davidson’s international trademark portfolio in emerging markets.

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests