By: Derek Hawkins//October 14, 2019//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Karma International, LLC, v. Indianapolis Motor Speedway, LLC,
Case No.: 18-2583; 18-3487
Officials: FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Summary Judgment – Damages
The Indianapolis 500 race has been a fixture of American life since 1911, interrupted only by world war. So when its 100th running arrived in 2016, organizers wanted to shift the race-weekend entertainment into high gear. They engaged Karma International, LLC, an event-planning company, to host a ticketed party.
Unlike the Indianapolis 500 itself—which sold out for the first time in history—the Karma party was a disappointment. Poor ticket sales prevented Karma from covering its expenses. Karma sued the racetrack for breach of contract, accusing it of failing to adequately promote the party. The racetrack counterclaimed, alleging that Karma ignored its own advertising obligations. The district judge rejected Karma’s claim at summary judgment, ruling that the damages theory rested on speculation. A jury found Karma liable on the counterclaim, awarding $75,000 in damages. Karma appeals, seeking review of the summary-judgment ruling and the denial of its posttrial motions for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial.
We affirm. Karma’s evidence of damages is indeed speculative, so its claim fails under Indiana law. And we see no reason to second-guess the jury’s determination that Karma breached the parties’ contract by failing to fulfill its promises to advertise the event online.
Affirmed