By: Derek Hawkins//September 23, 2019//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. Michael S. Barber
Case No.: 18-2803
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and EASTERBROOK and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Sentencing Guidelines
On the evening of February 9, 2017, Michael Barber and his friend Anthony Chipps used a crowbar to break into Dutchman Hunting Supplies in Shipshewana, Indiana, and steal 15 handguns. The authorities had little trouble nabbing them: they set off the alarm during the robbery, and they were easily identified by shop employees, because they had scouted out Dutchman earlier that same day. On top of that, Barber was foolish enough to discuss the robbery on Facebook Messenger.
In due course, Barber was indicted on charges of stealing firearms from a federally licensed firearms dealer, possessing firearms as a felon, and possessing stolen firearms. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(u), (g)(1), and (j). Chipps decided to cooperate with the government and testified at trial against Barber. In addition, the government introduced both the Facebook messages and cell‐location data for Barber’s phone. The latter evidence put him near Dutchman at the time of the robbery. The jury convicted him on all charges, and the court then sentenced him to 210 months’ imprisonment. That sentence reflected a two‐level enhancement in his offense level for obstruction of justice.
Barber appeals both his conviction and sentence. He argues that the district court should not have admitted the Facebook records, cell‐location data, and a certificate indicating that Dutchman had a firearms license. He also contends that his advisory sentencing guidelines should not have included the obstruction enhancement. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
Affirmed