Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Preliminary Injunction – Judicial Bypass Procedure

By: Derek Hawkins//September 23, 2019//

Preliminary Injunction – Judicial Bypass Procedure

By: Derek Hawkins//September 23, 2019//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., v. Jerome M. Adams, et al.

Case No.: 17-2428

Officials: KANNE, ROVNER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Focus: Preliminary Injunction – Judicial Bypass Procedure

Consistent with Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622 (1979), Indiana statutes have long provided a fast and confidential judicial bypass procedure that is supposed to allow a small fraction of pregnant, unemancipated minors seeking abortions to obtain them without the consent of or notice to their parents, guardians, or custodians. In 2017, Indiana added a parental notification requirement to the judicial bypass statute. Before the law took effect, plaintiff Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. sued to enjoin its enforcement. In a careful opinion, the district court issued a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the new law’s notice requirements. Planned Parenthood of Indiana & Kentucky, Inc. v. Commissioner, 258 F. Supp. 3d 929, 956 (S.D. Ind. 2017). The defendant state officials have appealed a portion of the preliminary injunction. In light of the lopsided factual record, the deferential standard of review, and the preliminary status of the findings of fact and conclusions of law, we affirm.

Affirmed

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is trademark corporate counsel for Harley-Davidson. Hawkins oversees the prosecution and maintenance of the Harley-Davidson’s international trademark portfolio in emerging markets.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests