Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Statutory Interpretation

By: Derek Hawkins//July 10, 2019//

Statutory Interpretation

By: Derek Hawkins//July 10, 2019//

Listen to this article

United States Supreme Court

Case Name: Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, et al.

Case No.: 17-1594

Focus: Statutory Interpretation

In the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011, 35 U. S. C. §100 et seq., Congress created the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and established three new types of administrative proceedings before the Board that allow a “person” other than the patent owner to challenge the validity of a patent post-issuance. The question presented in this case is whether a federal agency is a “person” able to seek such review under the statute. We conclude that it is not.

Reversed and remanded

Dissenting: BREYER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG and KAGAN, JJ., joined.

Concurring:

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is trademark corporate counsel for Harley-Davidson. Hawkins oversees the prosecution and maintenance of the Harley-Davidson’s international trademark portfolio in emerging markets.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests