Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Statutory Interpretation – Restitution

By: Derek Hawkins//April 2, 2019//

Statutory Interpretation – Restitution

By: Derek Hawkins//April 2, 2019//

Listen to this article

WI Court of Appeals – District III

Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Mao T. Xiong

Case No.: 2017AP2306-CR

Officials: Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ.

Focus: Statutory Interpretation – Restitution

Mao Xiong appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate a restitution order entered five years after his judgment of conviction. Xiong contends the restitution order was issued in violation of WIS. STAT. § 973.20(13)(c). We conclude the record is currently insufficient to provide a basis for the restitution award. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Full Text


Derek A Hawkins is trademark corporate counsel for Harley-Davidson. Hawkins oversees the prosecution and maintenance of the Harley-Davidson’s international trademark portfolio in emerging markets.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests