By: Derek Hawkins//December 3, 2018//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. Duprece Jet, et al.
Case No.: 17-2051; 17-2052; 17-2060
Officials: KANNE, SYKES, and ST. EVE, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Sufficiency of Evidence
Two armed men robbed three cash-and-check stores in the Indianapolis area. The heists were not especially sophisticated, but they went viral over the robbers’ 1970s-themed disguises. That attention drew an anonymous tip, which led law enforcement to Duprece Jett and Damion McKissick, as well as a third man, Earl Walker, who officers believed was involved in a planned fourth robbery.
The government charged all three men with conspiracy in violation of the Hobbs Act and attempted bank robbery. A jury convicted them on both counts. Jett, McKissick, and Walker now appeal, citing a host of trial errors they submit require acquittal or a new trial. We see only one such error, with respect to the sufficiency of the evidence on the attempted-robbery count. We reverse and remand with instructions that the district court enter a judgment of acquittal on that count and resentence the defendants. Otherwise, we affirm.
Affirmed