By: Derek Hawkins//August 29, 2018//
WI Court of Appeals – District IV
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Brian D. Frazier
Case No.: 2017AP1249-CR
Officials: Lundsten, P.J., Blanchard and Kloppenburg, JJ.
Focus: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
Brian Frazier appeals the judgment of conviction for one count of physical abuse of a child and one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child under thirteen by sexual contact, and the circuit court’s order denying his postconviction motion requesting a Machner hearing. Frazier argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to move to suppress the confession that he contends police obtained from him during an interrogation in violation of his Miranda rights under the Fifth Amendment, and that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel on that ground. The underlying issue on appeal is whether Frazier was in custody at the time of his confession, which created a basis for seeking suppression of his confession. We conclude that Frazier was in custody at the time of the confession and, because police had not read him the Miranda warnings, a motion to suppress his confession should have been successful. It follows that Frazier is entitled to a Machner hearing, at which Frazier will have an opportunity to attempt to prove the prejudice prong of ineffective assistance of counsel relative to his entry of a plea.