By: Derek Hawkins//August 27, 2018//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. Kash Deshawn Lee
Case No.: 17-2537
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and EASTERBROOK and BARRETT, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Sentencing – Supervised Release
Kash Lee appeals the sentence he received when his supervised release was revoked. He faults the district court for not addressing what he now characterizes as his principal argument in mitigation: that a longer sentence would unjustifiably subject him to harsher treatment than similarly situated defendants. But Lee did not make this argument in the district court, so the district court had no obligation to address it. Lee also complains that the district court failed to fill out a form stating the reasons for his sentence. It is not clear that a district court has an obligation to fill out such a form when revoking supervised release. Even if it does, however, Lee suffered no prejudice from the district court’s failure to complete this administrative task.
Affirmed