By: Derek Hawkins//August 27, 2018//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Adam J. Levitt, et al. v. Southwest Airlines Company
Case No.: 17-3541
Officials: FLAUM, MANION, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Class Action – Attorney’s Fees
This is the third appeal regarding attorney fees to stem from a class action against Southwest Airlines after it stopped honoring in‐flight drink vouchers for customers who bought “Business Select” fares. We thought the case was over after the first appeal, In re Southwest Airlines Voucher Litigation (Southwest I), 799 F.3d 701 (7th Cir. 2015), because the settlement made the customers whole by giving them a replacement voucher. At least, it made whole the small group of customers who submitted claims.
After the appeal, class counsel—Siprut PC—requested additional fees. The district court awarded them. Markow, the objector, appealed but dismissed the appeal after Southwest tripled the relief to the class—by giving two additional vouchers for every one claimed—to narrow the gap between the amount of supplemental fees Siprut would receive and the value of the relief the class would actually receive. The district court approved that agreement. Objector Markow then moved for fees and an incentive award. The district court denied the motion, reasoning that requiring Siprut to pay Markow’s fees out of Siprut’s supplemental fee award “undoes the settlement.” In re Southwest Airlines Voucher Litigation (South‐ west II), 2017 WL 5295372, at *5 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 13, 2017). Markow has appealed. We reverse and remand. Unless the parties to a class action settlement agreement, including objecting parties, expressly agree otherwise, settlement agreements should not be read to bar objectors from requesting fees for their efforts in adding value to a settlement
Reversed and Remanded