By: Derek Hawkins//July 18, 2018//
WI Supreme Court
Case Name: Ascaris Mayo, et al. v. Wisconsin Injured Patients and Families
Case No.: 2018 WI 78
Focus: Noneconomic Damages – Medical Malpractice
Our review considers whether the legislatively-enacted cap of $750,000 (the cap) on noneconomic damages for victims of medical malpractice that is set out in Wis. Stat. § 893.55 (2015-16) is unconstitutional facially or as applied, based on equal protection and due process grounds. In reliance on Ferdon ex rel. Petrucelli v. Wis. Patients Comp. Fund, 2005 WI 125, 284 Wis. 2d 573, 701 N.W.2d 440, the court of appeals concluded that the cap was facially unconstitutional. The court of appeals did not address whether § 893.55 was unconstitutional as applied to Ascaris and Antonio Mayo (the Mayos). However, the circuit court had concluded that the $750,000 cap on noneconomic damages was unconstitutional as applied to the Mayos.
We conclude that rational basis is the proper standard by which to judge the constitutionality of Wis. Stat. § 893.55; that § 893.55 is facially constitutional and constitutional as applied to the Mayos; and that Ferdon erroneously invaded the province of the legislature and applied an erroneous standard of review. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals’ decision, overrule Ferdon, and conclude that the $750,000 cap on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice judgments and settlements is constitutional both facially and as applied to the Mayos.
Therefore, we reverse the court of appeals and remand to the circuit court to impose the $750,000 cap on noneconomic damages.
Reversed and Remanded
Concur: R.G. BRADLEY, J., concurs, joined by KELLY, J. (opinion filed).
Dissent: A.W. BRADLEY, J., dissents, joined by ABRAHAMSON, J. (opinion filed).