Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Legal News / Justices uphold ban on owning both cemeteries, funeral homes

Justices uphold ban on owning both cemeteries, funeral homes

By SCOTT BAUER, Associated Press

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A divided Wisconsin Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the state’s ban on joint ownership of cemeteries and funeral homes, rejecting a lawsuit from a cemetery owner who argued that the prohibition stifles competition and is irrational and unconstitutional.

The court’s 5-2 ruling upheld a state appeals court decision from last year rejecting a lawsuit filed by Highland Memorial Park, a cemetery in New Berlin, and its owner E. Glenn Porter.

Justice Shirley Abrahamson, writing for the majority, said the laws in question do not violate the equal-protection clauses of the state or U.S. constitutions. Abrahamson wrote that the laws are “rationally related to the legitimate government interests” of protecting vulnerable customers.

They also limit or minimize the manipulation of money required to be held in trust by funeral directors and cemetery operators, she wrote.

Justices Dan Kelly and Rebecca Bradley dissented, saying there’s no rational basis connecting the laws to a legitimate government interest. They argued the laws should be declared unconstitutional.

The conservative law firm Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty represented the cemetery and its principal owner. A spokesman for the law firm hadn’t returned a message seeking comment Wednesday.

A spokesman for the state Department of Justice, which defended the laws, did not immediately return a message.

Porter, the cemetery owner, wants to expand the business and offer funeral services in addition to cemetery services. He argued that Wisconsin’s laws banning joint ownership are overly restrictive and prevent cemetery owners and funeral home directors from conducting business as they see fit.

He said the laws are unconstitutional because they violation the constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection.

The state argued that so-called “anti-combination” laws preserve competition, protect consumers from higher prices and reduce the possibility that cemetery and funeral revenues that are required to be held in trust will be intermingled.

The Waukesha County circuit court sided with the state and summarily rejected the cemetery’s lawsuit in 2016. A state appeals court agreed in 2017 and the Supreme Court upheld that ruling.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *