By: Derek Hawkins//May 30, 2018//
WI Supreme Court
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Shaun M. Sanders
Case No.: 2018 WI 51
Focus: Statutory Competency
This is a review of a published decision of the court of appeals affirming the Waukesha County Circuit Court’s judgment of conviction and order denying postconviction relief to Shaun Sanders. State v. Sanders, 2017 WI App 22, 375 Wis. 2d 248, 895 N.W.2d 41. Sanders raises a single issue for our review: do circuit courts possess statutory competency to proceed in criminal matters when the adult defendant was charged for conduct he committed before his tenth birthday?
We hold that circuit courts possess statutory competency to proceed in criminal matters when the adult defendant was charged for conduct he committed before his tenth birthday. The defendant’s age at the time he was charged, not his age at the time he committed the underlying conduct, determines whether the circuit court has statutory competency to hear his case as a criminal, juvenile delinquency, or JIPS matter. Consequently, the circuit court in this case possessed statutory competency to hear Sanders’ case as a criminal matter because he was an adult at the time he was charged. Therefore, his counsel did not perform deficiently by failing to raise a meritless motion. Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals.
Affirmed
Concur: A.W. BRADLEY, J., concurs, joined by ABRAHAMSON, J. (opinion filed).
Dissent: