By: Derek Hawkins//March 20, 2018//
WI Court of Appeals – District III
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Bruce D. Johnson
Case No.: 2017AP834-CR
Officials: HRUZ, J.
Focus: Sentence Modification
Bruce Johnson appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. Johnson argues he is entitled either to sentence modification due to a new factor or to resentencing because the circuit court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing. The main premise of both arguments is that the circuit court mistakenly believed Johnson would serve his sentence in jail instead of prison. We conclude that, assuming this constituted a new factor, the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in deciding this factor failed to justify modifying Johnson’s sentence. We also conclude the court did not rely on this fact at sentencing such that resentencing is required. Accordingly, we affirm.