By: Derek Hawkins//March 14, 2018//
WI Court of Appeals – District IV
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Sara L. Steppke
Case No.: 2017AP1683-CR
Officials: KLOPPENBURG, J.
Focus: Damages
Sara Steppke appeals the amended judgment of conviction for misdemeanor theft, which added as restitution $16,124.40 for security system upgrades undertaken after the theft was discovered. On appeal, Steppke makes two arguments in support of her contention that the costs of the security system upgrades are not recoverable as restitution under WIS. STAT. § 973.20: (1) the costs of the security system upgrades are prohibited general damages, not special damages; and (2) even if the costs of the security system upgrades are special damages, WIS. STAT. § 973.20(5)(a) limits special damages awarded as restitution to those that could be recovered in a civil action and, here, the security system upgrades would not be recoverable in a civil action for conversion. I reject Steppke’s first argument because I conclude that under controlling case law the security system upgrades are special damages within the meaning of WIS. STAT. § 973.20(5)(a). However, I take the State to concede Steppke’s second argument because the State does not refute that argument in any developed manner in its response brief. Therefore, I reverse.