By: Derek Hawkins//February 28, 2018//
WI Supreme Court
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Shannon Olance Hendricks
Case No.: 2018 WI 15
Focus: Plea Withdrawal
Shannon Olance Hendricks seeks to withdraw the guilty plea he entered to one count of child enticement. He claims the circuit court’s failure to tell him the legal definition of “sexual contact” at his plea hearing violated Wis. Stat. § 971.08’s requirement that a pleading defendant must understand the nature of the charge. Because sexual contact is not an element of the crime of child enticement, and because the record shows Hendricks understood the nature of the charge to which he pled guilty, the plea colloquy comported with both § 971.08 and State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), and Hendricks is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals decision upholding the circuit court’s order denying Hendricks’ motion for plea withdrawal. Moreover, we decline the State’s request to modify the Bangert requirements.
Affirmed
Concur:
Dissent: ABRAHAMSON, J. dissents, joined by A.W. BRADLEY,