By: Derek Hawkins//July 5, 2017//
WI Supreme Court
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Raymond L. Nieves
Case No.: 2017 WI 69
Focus: Court Error – Testimony
We review a decision of the court of appeals vacating the judgment of conviction of Raymond Nieves (Nieves) and remanding for a new trial. Nieves was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide, as a party to the crime and with the use of a dangerous weapon and attempted first-degree intentional homicide, as a party to the crime and with the use of a dangerous weapon. Nieves’ argument on appeal is two-fold. First, Nieves argues the circuit court erred when it denied his pretrial motion to sever his trial from the trial of his co-defendant, Johnny Maldonado (Maldonado). Nieves contends the circuit court’s failure to sever the trials and the subsequent admission of Maldonado’s inculpatory statements violated his rights under Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968) and Wis. Stat. § 971.12(3) (2009-10). Second, Nieves contends that the circuit court erred in admitting the statement of “Boogie Man” because it was inadmissible hearsay. We conclude that Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) and its progeny limited the application of the Bruton doctrine to instances in which a co-defendant’s statements are testimonial. Therefore, Bruton is not violated by the admission of a non-testifying co-defendant’s statements that are nontestimonial. In the present case, Maldonado’s statements were nontestimonial, and therefore Nieves’ confrontation rights were not violated. Accordingly, the circuit court did not err in denying Nieves’ motion to sever the trials.
Reversed and remanded
Dissent: A.W. Bradley, Abrahamson
Concurring: