By: Derek Hawkins//March 1, 2017//
United States Supreme Court
Case Name: Buck v. Davis
Case No.: 15-8049
Focus: Certificate of Appealability
5th Circuit exceeded limited scope of certificate of appealability analysis
“The COA statute sets forth a two-step process: an initial determination whether a claim is reasonably debatable, and, if so, an ap peal in the normal course. 28 U. S. C. §2253. At the first stage, the only question is whether the applicant has shown that “jurists of reason could disagree with the district court’s resolution of his constitutional claims or . . . could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U. S. 322, 327. Here, the Fifth Circuit phrased its determination in proper terms. But it reached its conclusion only after essentially deciding the case on the merits, repeatedly faulting Buck for having failed to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances. The question for the Court of Appeals was not whether Buck had shown that his case is extraordinary; it was whether jurists of reason could debate that issue. The State points to the Fifth Circuit’s thorough consideration of the merits to defend that court’s approach, but this hurts rather than helps its case.
Dissenting: THOMAS; ALITO