Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Legal News / Judge refuses to order hand recount in Wisconsin (UPDATE)

Judge refuses to order hand recount in Wisconsin (UPDATE)

Wisconsin Elections Commission Chair Mark Thomsen addresses members of the media regarding a requested recount of the state's presidential election results following a meeting of the commission in Madison, Wis. Monday, Nov. 28, 2016. (John Hart/Wisconsin State Journal via AP)

Wisconsin Elections Commission Chair Mark Thomsen talks to the media regarding a requested recount of the state’s presidential election results following a meeting of the commission in Madison on Monday. (John Hart/Wisconsin State Journal via AP)

By Todd Richmond
Associated Press

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin judge refused on Tuesday to order local election workers to conduct the state’s upcoming presidential recount completely by hand, finding that nothing suggests the state’s electronic tabulating machines have been hacked.

Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein has been trying to make the case that Wisconsin’s tabulating machines could have been compromised in a cyberattack and a hand recount is the only way to tell for sure. But Dane County Circuit Court Judge Valerie Bailey-Rihn concluded Stein’s attorneys failed to show any hard evidence the machines were attacked and are unreliable.

Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton by about 22,000 votes in Wisconsin, but Stein has alleged — without evidence — that the results may have been hacked. She asked for a recount last week, saying the state needs to be sure.

The Wisconsin Election Commission had to grant the request under state law but refused another Stein request that the commission order all county clerks to recount the votes by hand, leaving it up to the counties to decide how to conduct the process.

Stein filed a lawsuit seeking a judge’s order for a hand recount. Hillary Clinton’s campaign joined the action Tuesday, saying she has a stake in the results.

State Department of Justice attorneys filed briefs Tuesday arguing that Stein hasn’t shown how a hand recount would change the election’s results. Elections Commission Administrator Mike Hass said only 19 counties plan to use electronic tabulators; the rest plan to count by hand.

Dane County Circuit Judge Valerie Bailey-Rihn convened a hearing late Tuesday afternoon that went on four hours. Stein’s side called computer experts who testified that Wisconsin’s electronic machines are vulnerable to cyberattack but said they couldn’t show whether one had actually occurred.

“All that we have here is 100 percent hypothetical speculation about what could possibly happen. That’s not convincing evidence,” Assistant Attorney General S. Michael Murphy told the judge.

Bailey-Rihn ultimately sided with the state, finding that Stein and Clinton’s lawyers failed to show any irregularities that prove electronic tabulators could be problematic in the recount.

Debbie Greenberger, one of Stein’s attorneys, told reporters after the decision that Stein would consider appeal options. In the meantime, she said hopes the counties take to heart the judge’s remarks about a hand recount being the best way to proceed.

Under state law, Stein is responsible for covering the costs of the recount. The commission initially estimated the recount would cost her $3.5 million but on Tuesday revised the cost estimate to $3.9 million. The commission required Stein to pay $3.5 million Tuesday and said she would have to cover any additional costs.

Stein has raised $6.4 million online since last week to cover recounts in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. She griped about Wisconsin’s costs being exorbitant but paid the money with five minutes to spare Tuesday. That payment cleared the way for the recount to begin Thursday.

Independent presidential candidate Roque De La Fuente withdrew his request for a Wisconsin recount Tuesday, saying the process would cost too much.


  1. Who’s hands? How are they selected? Anybody with time for such a task might be susceptable to Soros’ certain attempts to get his desired count.

  2. Jilting Stein thinks it’s okay to pursue this despite HAVING NO EVIDENCE OF ANYTHING. I hope she fades into the mist after this, because this is a massive waste of time, getting one side of an already divided nation’s hopes up, only to have them dashed against the rocks once again.

    Jilting Stein has rejected the notion of allowing a fair election to move forward and robbed voters of millions of dollars for this futility and asked voters to sign affidavits alleging fraud despite having no evidence of such, risking federal crimes in the process.

    Jilting Stein has turned away from green party principles and has subverted the party to align herself with Clinton.

    She is a disgrace to the election process and a thorn in the side of an America that is just trying to move forward.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *