By: Derek Hawkins//June 20, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. Derrick R. Clinton
Case No.: 15-1346
Officials: ROVNER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SHAH, District Judge
Focus: Pleas & Sentencing
Court erred in failing to address health problems as a mitigating factor warranting a decreased sentence.
“The record thus provides little support for such an enhancement. We do not hold that the enhancement is inapplicable as a matter of law, but the fact findings in this record do not support the enhancement. The district court identified only the generalized need for protection by those engaged in drug offenses. But that would apply whenever a person who sold drugs also possessed a firearm in the residence. It would transform the “close proximity” test of Application Note 14 to a broad‐based rebuttable presumption that the enhancement applied whenever a firearm was possessed and a drug offense was also alleged regardless of the location of the firearm and its proximity to the drugs. The Sentencing Commission could have imposed an enhancement if any weapon was possessed without requiring that it be possessed in connection with the offense, but it chose not to do so. See United States v. Carillo‐Ayala, 713 F.3d 82, 89‐90 (11th Cir. 2013)(comparing the provision in § 2D1.1(b)(1) requiring only that a weapon was possessed with the requirement under § 5C1.2(a)(2) that the firearm was possessed in connection with the offense).Because the court’s findings are insufficient to support application of the four‐level enhancement, that determination is vacated and the case must be remanded for resentencing.”
Vacated and Remanded for Resentencing