By: Derek Hawkins//June 14, 2016//
WI Court of Appeals – District III
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Mark Anthony Darland
Case No.: 2015AP464-CR; 2015AP465-CR
Officials: Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ.
Focus: Sentence Modification
Mark Darland appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Darland sought an eighteen-month reduction in the first of his two consecutive terms of initial confinement based on the existence of a new sentencing factor. The new factor, according to Darland, is that, given the consecutive nature of his sentences on the two drug related offenses, he could never attain the minimum custody classification required by the Department of Corrections (DOC) to take advantage of the risk reduction sentence (RRS) program while serving his first sentence. We affirm because Darland’s inability to complete the RRS program during his first sentence was not highly relevant to the circuit court’s sentencing decision and thus does not constitute a new factor warranting sentence modification.