By: Derek Hawkins//June 6, 2016//
Case Name: Calumet River Fleeting, Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers
Case No.: 15-3174
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and SYKES and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Collective Bargaining Agreement – Arbitration
Appellant did not appear to be party to collective bargaining agreement, therefore not required to submit to arbitration.
“Arbitration “is a matter of contract and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit.” AT & T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers of America, 475 U.S. 643, 648 (1986) (internal quotation marks omitted), quoting United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 582 (1960). The Union has failed to pose a genuine dispute of fact as to whether Calumet agreed to submit the termination of Zuccolo to arbitration. Its alter ego argument failed as discussed above, and the undisputed facts of record show that Calumet terminated its participation in the Floating Agreement in 2008. Nor has the Union presented any evidence that Calumet itself signed on to later versions of the agreement. On this record, Calumet was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
Affirmed