By: Derek Hawkins//May 31, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. Norman Shaw, Jr.
Case No.: 14-2881
Officials: BAUER, FLAUM, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges
Focus: Pleas & Sentencing – General Appeal
Court provides adequate explanation for departure from sentencing guidelines given facts of case and appellant history.
“Here, while the district court’s sentence was a major departure from the Sentencing Guidelines range, the district court gave a sufficiently adequate explanation for the departure. The district court related the sentence to Shaw’s present offense, noting that “heroin puts so many at risk including prison staff and other inmates” and that such drugs “could result in violence.” It also detailed Shaw’s ongoing criminal history, repeated “failure to comply … with conditions of parole and supervised release,” and “non-compliance while in custody,” which included “seven violations resulting in disciplinary actions.” The district court also emphasized Shaw’s marked recidivism, saying at one point, “Incarceration hasn’t or doesn’t motivate you to refrain from criminal conduct and any motivation to change seems nonexistent.” It then sentenced Shaw in an effort to “[p]romote respect for the law[,] provide just punishment, afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct[,] and protect the public from further crimes,” in addition to other 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. This thorough explanation justified imprisoning Shaw for 60 months and renders the above-Guidelines sentence substantively reasonable.”
Affirmed