By: Derek Hawkins//April 18, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Susan A. Kuttner v. John Zaruba, et al
Case No.: 14-3812
Officials: POSNER, EASTERBROOK, and SYKES, Circuit Judges
Focus: Discrimination – Title VII
Appellant fired for collecting on a loan for a friend while in uniform fails to proffer facts sufficient to support discrimination claim.
“Kuttner’s prima facie case requires a showing of sufficiently analogous misconduct by male officers to support an inference that she was treated more harshly because of her sex. As the district judge correctly noted, the gravamen of the misconduct for which Kuttner was fired was “us[ing her] uniform to convey the impression that [she] was acting on the authority of the Sheriff’s Office, but was not.” It’s not just that Kuttner wore her uniform while off duty or even for unofficial purposes; the material point is how the uniform was being used—for the improper projection of coercive police authority in service of a personal end. That’s what differentiates Kuttner’s misconduct from, for example, Deputy Morgan’s allowing his girlfriend to wear his uniform to a Halloween party or making two personal visits to a female inmate in the jail. In Deputy Morgan’s case, there were no allegations of coercion by the use or appearance of legal authority.”
Affirmed