By: Derek Hawkins//February 16, 2016//
WI Supreme Court
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Charles V. Matalonis
Case No: 2014AP108-CR
Focus: Motion to Suppress
Warrantless search of appellant’s home by police was reasonably exercised
“Taken together, our balancing test shows: (1) a significant public interest and an exigent situation; (2) a significant intrusion on Matalonis’s constitutional rights, but one tailored to the needs of the situation; and (3) few or no available, feasible, and effective alternatives. We conclude that, on balance, the officers’ exercise of the community caretaker function was reasonable “because the public interest in the search outweighed [Matalonis’s] privacy interests.” Gracia, 345 Wis. 2d 488, ¶30.”
ABRAHAMSON, J., dissents. (Opinion Filed)
PROSSER, ABRAHAMSON, A.W. BRADLEY, J.J.J., dissent. (Opinion Filed)