By: Derek Hawkins//January 27, 2016//
7TH Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: VLM Food Trading International v. Illinois Trading company
Case No.: 14-2776
Officials: EASTERBROOK, ROVNER, and SYKES, Circuit Judges
Practice Area: Disputed Contract – International Trade
Dispute arises over attorney fees provision of supplier contract.
“Each Illinois Trading purchase order met all the Convention’s criteria for an offer; they included sufficiently definite terms, were directed to VLM specifically, and indicated that Illinois Trading intended to be bound by VLM’s acceptance. See Convention art. 14(1). Each of VLM’s confirmation e-mails was, in turn, an effective acceptance of Illinois Trading’s offer because each one confirmed and accepted the terms of the purchase order. Id. art. 18(1).2 As such, the contracts were formed when Illinois Trading received VLM’s confirmation e-mails. Id. art. 18(2). The attorney’s fees provision was not part of the agreement described in the purchase orders and the e-mail confirmations; that term first appeared in the trailing invoices that were mailed to Illinois Trading after VLM delivered the produce.”
Affirmed