By: Derek Hawkins//January 18, 2016//
WI Supreme Court
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Brett W. Dumstrey
Case No.: 2013AP857-CR
Practice Area: Motion to Suppress – 4th Amendment
Parking garage under appellant homes does not constitute curtilage of his home and no expectation of privacy awarded there.
“That the parking garage is included within the enclosure of the entire apartment building could tend to favor the garage being part of his home’s curtilage. However, we note that, under this same rationale, Dumstrey’s 29 fellow tenants’ apartments are likewise included within the same enclosure as his own apartment. As indicated above, it cannot reasonably be contended that each of these tenants’ homes constitutes part of Dumstrey’s home for purposes of the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, we are not persuaded by the parking garage being included within the overall enclosure that encompasses the entire apartment building.”
Affirmed
PROSSER, GABLEMAN, J.J., concur. (Opinion Filed)
A.W. BRADLEY, ABRAHAMSON, J.J., dissent. (Opinion Filed)
R.G. Bradley, J., did not participate.