By: Derek Hawkins//December 30, 2015//
WI Supreme Court
Case Name: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. Crandall
Case No.: 2014AP2587
Practice Area: Disciplinary Proceedings
Attorney receives public reprimand
“In January of 2012, Attorney Crandall continued to be identified, during his period of suspension, as the attorney of record in three separate appellate cases. The OLR alleged that Attorney Crandall did not properly provide either his clients or the Court of Appeals with the notices required by SCR 22.26 in those three cases. Accordingly, the referee determined that, by failing to send, on or before the effective date of his suspension, written notice of his suspension by certified mail to the three clients in the three separate appeals, Attorney Crandall violated SCR 22.26(1)(a) and (b) (Count Three).”
ABRAHAMSON, A.W. BRADLEY, J.J., dissent. (Opinion filed)