By: Derek Hawkins//November 11, 2015//
Criminal
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and POSNER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Pleas & Sentencing – Mandatory Minimum/Statutory Maximum
No. 14-2701 United States of America v. Gloria Harper
Sentence imposed by District court judge ordered to be revised for numerous problematic statements and failure to provide reasons for imposition of certain conditions of supervised release.
“Supervised release is mandatory for certain crimes, see, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b), but not for the ones the defendant in this case was convicted of. And when as in this case some of the conditions are discretionary the sentencing judge must give a reason for the imposition of each such condition that he or she imposes. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3583(c), (d)(1)–(3); United States v. Thompson, supra, 777 F.3d at 373. The judge didn’t do that. Moreover, the written judgment imposes 13 conditions of supervised release that she didn’t mention at the sentencing hearing. That was a mistake; the entire sentence is the sentence stated orally by the judge at the sentencing hearing. Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(c); United States v. Kappes, supra, 782 F.3d at 862; United States v. Alburay, 415 F.3d 782, 788 (7th Cir. 2005). Several of the written conditions in the judgment, moreover, have been criticized in recent decisions of ours. United States v. Sandidge, 784 F.3d 1055, 1068–69 (7th Cir. 2015); United States v. Thompson, supra, 777 F.3d at 376–80.”
Reversed and Remanded