By: Derek Hawkins//November 5, 2015//
Criminal
Court of Appeals – District II
Officials: Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Gundrum, J.
Order of Forfeiture
2014AP2226 State of Wisconsin v. One 2013, Toyota Corolla
Steven T. Baumgard and Gladys A. Vogel appeal from the circuit court’s order of forfeiture of the above-captioned 2013 Toyota Corolla. Defendants argue forfeiture of the Toyota pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 961.55 (2013-14) is improper because (1) Vogel is an innocent owner of it under the statute and (2) forfeiture violates the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We conclude the circuit court correctly determined the innocent owner exception to forfeiture does not apply to Vogel. We further conclude forfeiture of the Toyota and Baumgard’s financial interest in it is constitutional; however, forfeiture of Vogel’s full financial interest in the vehicle is unconstitutional under the Excessive Fines Clause. Accordingly, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion
Affirmed in Part. Reversed and Remanded in Part. Recommended for Publication