By: Derek Hawkins//August 10, 2015//
Criminal
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Officials: BAUER, EASTERBROOK, and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges
Motion to Suppress – Lack of Probable Cause
No. 14-3554 United States of America v. Andre Reaves
Reliable information from confidential informant indicating make model and year of appellants car, accompanied by officers watching the “events that [the informant] predicted unfold” sufficient for probable cause.
“We have found probable cause to search a suspect’s vehicle existed under the automobile exception based, in part, on an informant’s tip before. In United States v. Washburn, 383 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2004), we found that probable cause to search a vehicle existed where an informant provided inside information about the suspect’s identity and his ties to drug trafficking where that information was later corroborated by law enforcement officials. Id. at 642–43. We also noted that the informant’s reliability was confirmed as the officers “watched the events that [the informant] predicted unfold.” Id. at 642. The same happened here. The informant told police that Reaves would drive his white Chrysler Pacifica up to Detroit to receive his heroin supply, and then return to Peoria. The officers observed Reaves doing exactly this via the warrant-authorized GPS tracker. A reasonable officer, knowing what Officer Leach knew, would have had probable cause to believe Reaves’s Pacifica contained evidence of criminal activity, namely drug trafficking, under these circumstances. Thus, the police had probable cause to search Reaves’s vehicle pursuant to the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement and Reaves’s motion to suppress was rightfully denied.”
Affirmed.