By: Derek Hawkins//July 20, 2015//
Civil
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Disciplinary Proceedings – License Suspension
2013AP1619-D Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Paul A. Strouse
Where attorney with three previous public reprimands for professional misconduct receives sixty day suspension for continuing “pattern of disregard of supreme court rule requirements.”
“While the misconduct committed in this matter is not identical, we observe a continuing pattern of disregard of supreme court rule requirements. Representation anticipated to exceed $1,000 requires a written fee communication. See SCR 20:1.5. Unilateral changes to fees charged to clients certainly require more than a single line on an invoice. We note, with some concern, repeated discrepancies between disclosures on bankruptcy filings and invoices submitted to clients, a factor that adds to client confusion. As the referee observed, “by failing to accept responsibility for his actions and attempting to shift the blame to others for the poor handling of these matters, Attorney Strouse demonstrates that he lacks both remorse and insight into the impact of his repeated violations on his clients and other third parties.””
Per Curiam
BRADLEY, J. did not participate.